Imploding Blimp
Until there any semblance of a cohesive plan involving the relevant security forces, their ministries and the justice system, any statement about getting tough on crime is another batch of hot air. While the murder rate exceeds the calendar days, while the detection rate remains a single percentage figure, nothing short of a major upheaval from the likes of the Attorney General and the Ministry for National Security will begin to dent the current crime spree. There are logical answers to many of the problems plaguing the Police but instead of proactive plans we are provided with a review of the situation followed by the serve and return blame game.
The Police constantly blame the lack of vehicular resources, yet we have the constant reluctance to install CCTV cameras to act as a deterrent, a law enforcing presence and ultimately, provide evidence. Why the disinclination to invest in technology that negates the lack of both Police and their vehicles? I need and answer please Mr. Manning, Mr. Joseph is unable to provide any meaningful answers.
Staying with technology, why have we invested in modern technology for our banking, even digital television and broadband internet, all along the path to the propaganda on Vision 2020, yet we do not see the folly of police officers still working with paper and pen while operating without an advanced database system? Can Mr. Joseph stop being overwhelmed, while people live under siege and let me know of the forthcoming investment to implement the aforementioned system, tied to the new CCTVs and incorporating training for police officers across the board? The majority of the criminals are not geniuses but our ancient processes make it easy for them to carry out their crimes.
The witness protection programme is null and void and perhaps given the geography of T&T as well as corruption amongst the forces, protection may well be an impossible task. Why then are we still in the practice of witnesses providing evidence in person? Surely every effort has to be made to provide the confidence for individuals to come forth with damning evidence. There is no sense complaining about known perpetrators being given bail or escaping charges if we do not tighten the law regarding what is or is not a bailable offence and do not allow depositions via other methods other than ’in person.’ Mrs. New AG, Mr. next-CJ, have we considered these as the first steps towards supporting the police system?
At the other end of the crime spectrum we have to consider that the lawlessness of the land means that minor crimes continue to rise and when we do catch actually the lawbreakers, we throw them into jail shoulder to shoulder with gang members, killers and their ilk. Particularly in the case of young offenders, do we think that this ‘solution’ can produce anything but a hardened criminal? The whole point of jail is to rehabilitate, not just remove these individuals from society. Instead of Toruba stadium should we not build a Minor Offenders facility to prevent our own jails turning a petty thief into a true delinquent? Can we have the faith that the CoP, the reappointed security Minister and the newly appointed Minister of Education are forward thinking enough to develop a programme to truly rehabilitate rather than condemning our youths for life?
Of course the answer to all of these questions is a resounding “NO!” That itself sums up the approach to crime; no logical solutions and no meaningful change. Until the rhetoric about combating crime takes a radically different approach, we can regard any speech from the powers-that-be as hot air probably better used to keep the blimp afloat.
Sheldon Waithe